| MISSION: Southwest Research and Information Center is a multi-cultural organization working to promote the health of people and communities, protect natural resources, ensure citizen participation, and secure environmental and social justice now and for future generations. |
|
Voices from the Earth: Current Issue Table of “Those who develop the technologies, who promote them and stand to profit most from them, are not those who suffer their risks. The analysis of technologies is biased toward their use because the technology promoters generally lack the expertise and the incentive to analyze the risks of the technologies for human health and the environment.” H. Patricia Hynes, |
has
the WIPP Monster Mod been tamed?
After seventeen days of negotiations between March 9 and May 3, a stipulation was filed by federal and state officials and citizen organizations resolving many issues related to major changes in the operating permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The legally binding agreement was signed by the Department of Energy (DOE) and Washington TRU Solutions (the WIPP operating contractor), the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) and New Mexico Attorney General, and Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC), Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety (CCNS), and Citizens for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping (CARD). The agreement included about 180 pages with hundreds of changes in the draft permit that NMED issued on November 23, 2005. That draft permit incorporated most of the changes requested by DOE in its “monster mod” request that more than 2,000 people and organizations opposed because it would substantially loosen the health and safety requirements while dramatically increasing the amount and lethality of the waste coming to WIPP (see Voices, Spring 2006). DOE, the state agencies, and SRIC agreed to support and not challenge any provisions of the draft permit as revised during the public hearing in June. CCNS and CARD agreed to support most of the changes, but not those that allow remote-handled (RH) waste, and, for CARD, some of the provisions regarding monitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). WHAT CHANGES WERE MADE IN THE DRAFT PERMIT? Over the past seven years of WIPP’s operations, virtually all containers had headspace gas sampling and either radiography (x-rays) or visual examination (VE - taking waste out of the containers) at the generator/storage site to determine what was in the containers and that there were no prohibited items. The permit prohibits liquid wastes, pyrophoric materials; explosive and compressed gases; ignitable, corrosive, and reactive wastes; as well as chemically incompatible wastes. In section 310 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 2005, Congress called for replacing headspace gas sampling with underground VOC monitoring.
The negotiated revisions require that radiography or VE be done on each container of RH waste before it can be shipped and on all other containers unless an “Acceptable Knowledge Sufficiency Determination” (AKSD) is approved. That determination is a new process included in the draft permit in which the generator/storage site would demonstrate that its written records (“acceptable knowledge”) was sufficient to determine what hazardous wastes were in each container and that there were no prohibited items. The revised AKSD process includes more stringent requirements, and there can be public comment before NMED finds that the AKSD is adequate. The revision also allows for only one request for a waste stream. The revisions may result in relatively few AKSD requests being made and few being approved, and that the vast majority of containers will continue to have either radiography or VE. Waste confirmation Waste storage limits Remote-handled waste Citizens have long objected to RH waste because of the dangers from its intense radioactivity and because they saw it as a precursor to changing the law so that high-level waste could be disposed at WIPP. The primary method to prevent RH waste was DOE’s unwillingness to meet waste characterization requirements. In the negotiations, DOE agreed that all RH waste would be repackaged and subject to either radiography or VE. Thus, opponents had to oppose RH waste on health and safety grounds. A major focus of concern was on the need to use the hot cell at WIPP. The cell and its 54-inch think walls provide protection for workers from radiation and has cranes and other machines to allow waste drums to be taken out of the shipping containers and put into the canister for disposal in the wall of the underground rooms at WIPP. The handling in the Hot Cell includes the possibility of waste containers falling about 40 feet to the floor. In the negotiations, SRIC also pointed out that since waste had to be repackaged, it could be placed into the larger canisters that don’t require use of the Hot Cell. As a result, the revised permit allows only 390 cubic meters, or less than six percent of the RH capacity, to go through the Hot Cell. That amount is based on the estimated RH inventory at “small quantity sites.” The revision also reduces by almost 40 percent the amount of RH waste that can be disposed over the next several years. That provision makes it likely that there will not be enough room to dispose of the 7,079 cubic meters allowed. Public notification Outlook – Don Hancock FOR MORE INFORMATION: The WIPP website includes the permit modification request and other materials. http://www.wipp.energy.gov/rcradox/rfc/com_menu.htm The SRIC website includes other information about WIPP. http://www.sric.org/nuclear/nuclear2.html |
SRIC is a non-profit organization. All donations are tax-deductible. Thank you.
For further information contact Info@sric.org. |