| MISSION: Southwest Research and Information Center is a multi-cultural organization working to promote the health of people and communities, protect natural resources, ensure citizen participation, and secure environmental and social justice now and for future generations. |
|
Voices from the Earth: Current Issue
Table of Contrary to federal officials' vision of a largely vacant area, the West was never nearly empty enough. It contained too many residents who would, inevitably, be exposed to the pollution released by nuclear weapons programs. It also contained intricate ecosystems which, far from making for an "empty" place, ensured that radioactive and chemical waste would be absorbed into, distributed about, and concentrated within the landscape in quite complicated ways.
The Atomic West |
The Nuclear West Today
Commercial nuclear power
While about 20 percent of electricity nationwide comes from nuclear power, less than ten percent of Western electricity comes for nukes, far less than hydropower, coal, and natural gas. In addition, the West has abundant renewable energy resources (wind, solar, biomass) such that nuclear power is unnecessary for future electricity needs. Two major conclusions from those realities should be emphasized. First, since the vast majority of nuclear power plants are not in the West, most of the waste generated by those plants is also not in the region. Virtually all of the highly radioactive irradiated fuel is still on site, because there is no place to take it. Second, those power plants were sited without consideration for long-term storage and transportation and their effects on the West. People and governments in the West were not involved in those siting decisions. Transportation was not a factor-in fact when the plants were sited and constructed there was no idea of where the storage site(s) would be or how transportation would be accomplished. Those major public policy decisions, which were made in the 1960s and 1970s, should be considered irresponsible with respect to storage and transportation. And future decisions should not repeat such practices. However, the Skull Valley Goshute Reservation in Utah for long-term surface storage and the proposed Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada are the only sites targeted for those power plant wastes. Nuclear weapons
Major contamination has occurred at those sites, so it is likely that significant amounts of wastes will remain in perpetuity because of the inability to retrieve them, the lack of technology, or the large costs. Workers have been contaminated, thousands are sick and hundreds have died from exposures. The federal government has been slow to acknowledge those problems, and the lack of effective implementation of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 should be considered a national disgrace. Contamination has extended off-site, affecting many people and posing a continuing threat, which will grow unless effective cleanup occurs and new waste production is prevented. Of the sites with long-term nuclear weapons production missions, the three design laboratories (Livermore, Los Alamos, and Sandia) are in the West, the Nevada Test Site is in the West, while Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Savannah River Site in South Carolina; and the Pantex Plant in Texas are to the East. The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory has both nuclear weapons and nuclear power missions. The new plutonium production facility is to be sited next year (see pages 4-5). The two deep underground waste disposal sites are in the West-Yucca Mountain and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico. Uranium mining and milling
"Low-level" waste
|
SRIC is a non-profit organization. All donations are tax-deductible. Thank you.
For further information contact Info@sric.org. |